An Analysis of Fraud Hexagon and its Influence on Fraudulent Financial Reporting of Construction Companies in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jambak.v4i1.320Keywords:
Fraud Hexagon, Fraudulent Financial Report, Construction Industry, Beneish M-Score, IDXAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of the elements within the Fraud Hexagon theory on fraudulent financial report in construction companies. The Fraud Hexagon is an expansion of previous fraud theories and consists of six key dimensions: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion. This research adopts a quantitative approach using multiple linear regression analysis. The variables used as proxies for the Fraud Hexagon elements include asset growth, monitoring effectiveness, audit opinion, board of director changes, CEO duality, and political connections. Data were obtained from annual reports of IDX-listed construction companies during the period of 2019-2023. The results show that several elements of the Fraud Hexagon have a significant effect on financial statement fraud, particularly within the construction industry, which is characterized by operational complexity and vulnerability to manipulation.
References
ACFE. (2020). 2020 Report to the Nations.
ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report To The Nations.
Aghghaleh, S. F., Mohamed, Z. M., & Rahmat, M. M. (2016). Detecting Financial Statement Frauds in Malaysia: Comparing the Abilities of Beneish and Dechow Models. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 7, 57–65.
Ayuningtyas, E. S., & Harymawan, I. (2022). Risk Management Committee and Textual Risk Disclosure. Risks, 10(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10020030.
Beneish, M. D., Bernard, V., Ciesielski, J., Deangelo, L., Fridson, M., Harvey, C., Hsieh, D., Lee, C., Press, E., Whaley, B., & Zmijewski, M. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation Comments Welcome.
Chang, C., & Sun, H. (2018). Reputation and regulation effects on director turnover and change of directorships. The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.
Cressey’s. (2008). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud : The Efectiveness Of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No.99. 99, 53–81.
Cressy, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (Edisi ke 10). Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
Emeritus, P., Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Columbus, B., New, I., San, Y., Upper, F., River, S., Cape, A., Dubai, T., Madrid, L., Munich, M., Montreal, P., Delhi, T., Sao, M. C., Sydney, P., Kong, H., Singapore, S., & Tokyo, T. (2012). AN INTEGRATED APPROACH AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES (Vol. 14).
Faradiza, S. A. (2015). Fraud Pentagon dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Sekar Akrom Faradiza.
Ghozali, I. (2012). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19 edisi 5.
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics.
Jensen, M. G., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.
McCarten, M., Diaz-Rainey, I., Roberts, H., & Tan, E. K. M. (2022). Political connections, tacit power and corporate misconduct. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 49(9–10), 1530–1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12603.
Newman, P., Rhoades, S., & Smith, R. (1996). Allocating audit resources to detect fraud. Review of Accounting Studies, 1(2), 161–182.
Rini, A. S. (2014). Opini Audit dan Pengungkapan Atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Kabupaten Serta Kaitannya Dengan Koripsi Indonesia. Jurnal Etikonomi, 13(1).
Salehi, M., Moradi, M., & Paiydarmanesh, N. (2017). The effect of corporate governance and audit quality on disclosure quality: Evidence from Tehran stock exchange. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 25(1), 32–48.
Singleton, T. w., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting (4th ed.). Wiley Corporate F&A.
Skog, I. (2018). IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with customers.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tan., Angelina, Novita., & Chariri, Anis. (2022). Pengaruh Proporsi Dewan Komisaris Independen , Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 11, 1–13.
Utami, D. (2009). Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Manajemen Laba dan Kinerja Keuangan.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
Wang, Z., Chen, M. H., Chin, C. L., & Zheng, Q. (2017). Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(2), 141–162.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2005). Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Roles of the Board and the Audit Committee.
Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125(August 2015), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.035.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syifani Andira, Islahuddin Islahuddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
























