The Effect of Performance Measurement System, Reward, Accounting Information System, and Leadership Style on Managerial Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jambak.v4i1.164Keywords:
managerial performance, SIA & Performance measurement systemAbstract
This research investigates the potential significant effects of performance measurement system, reward, accounting information system, and leadership style on managerial performance at PT Supra Matra Abadi Aek Nabara. The methodology employed included field research utilizing questionnaires distributed to company employees, complemented by literature review techniques. Individual variable analysis revealed several key findings. The Performance Measurement System (X1) demonstrated a significant impact on managerial performance (Y) as evidenced by the t significance value of 0.006, falling below the 0.05 threshold. Conversely, the Reward variable (X2) showed no substantial influence on managerial performance (Y), with a t significance value of 0.673 exceeding the 0.05 criterion. The accounting information system variable (X3) exhibited a significant effect on managerial performance (Y), supported by a t significance value of 0.027, below the 0.05 benchmark.
References
Afriantoni, & Misni, F. (2018). [Referenced study on Performance Measurement System effects on Managerial Performance].
Ariani, K. R., Andari, Y., & Satriawan, R. A. (2023). [Study on descriptive statistics methodologies for research data analysis].
Azhari. (2021). Managerial performance: Dimensions and organizational effectiveness from managerial and economic perspectives.
Dharmawati, R., Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2019). [Study on Accounting Information Systems as referenced in 2023 publication].
Flantika, S. (2017). [Research on the significant influence of Performance Measurement System on Managerial Performance].
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 [Application of multivariate analysis with IBM SPSS 25 program].
Haga, W. J. (2018). Performance measurement systems: Functions in stimulating employee efficiency.
Henri Fayol. Classical Management Theory. [Cited in relation to managerial performance and management functions].
Hermawan, S., & Amirullah. (2016). [Research methodology study on reliability assessment].
Hidayah, N. (2018). Leadership essentials: Building cohesive teams and fostering collective decision-making capabilities.
Horngren, T. C. (1991). Management Accounting Theory: A systematic approach to information processing.
Ivana. (2016). [Study on leadership style effects on managerial performance].
Jumaidi, et al. (2021). [Research finding no partial effect of leadership style on managerial performance].
Paramitha, I. A. M. (2017). [Research establishing independent effect of Accounting Information Systems on Managerial Performance metrics].
Pramesti, W., et al. (2019). Reward systems as strategic mechanisms for enhancing managerial performance.
Purnomo, R. A. (2017). [Methodology resource on normality testing and multicollinearity in regression analysis].
Putri, I. G. A. M. A. D., et al. (2022). [Study on validity and reliability testing methodologies].
Rifkhan. (2023). [Research on classical assumption tests for regression analysis].
Roesminingsih, M. V., et al. (2024). [Research on multicollinearity testing in regression models].
Rohma, N. (2021). Accounting information systems: Framework for data collection, recording, storage, and processing.
Rumapea, M., et al. (2018). [Research demonstrating no independent effect of reward systems on managerial performance].
Sitorus, H. M., et al. (2022). Performance measurement systems and workplace dimensions through comprehensive assessment.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggi chelcelia Manullang, Lamria Sagala, Januardi Mesakh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
