Axiology of Science: Dimensions of Mora Values and Responsibilities in the Development of Modern Science

Pandu Yudi Putra; Agung Winarno; Subagyo Subagyo

doi:10.55927/fjas.v4i12.517

Authors

Pandu Yudi Putra Universitas Negeri Malang
Agung Winarno Universitas Negeri Malang
Subagyo Subagyo Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v4i12.517

Keywords:

Science Axiology, Scientific Ethics, Scientist Moral Responsibility, Philosophy of Values, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This article explores the central role of axiology in the development of contemporary science, focusing on the dimensions of scientists' values, ethics, and moral responsibility. Through an interdisciplinary approach that integrates philosophy of science, applied ethics, and contemporary case studies, this article outlines how axiology serves as a normative compass in directing the advancement of science to remain on the side of humanity. The findings suggest that modern technological challenges such as artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and ecological crises demand deeper axiological reflection to ensure that science contributes to human emancipation, not technocratic domination. This article concludes that an axiological understanding is not only theoretically important, but also essential in shaping responsible and sustainable research policies.

References

Audi, R. (Ed.). (2011). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bollyky, T. J., & Bown, C. P. (2020). The tragedy of vaccine nationalism: Only cooperation can end the pandemic. Foreign Affairs, 99(5), 96-108.

BonJour, L. (2002). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield.

Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1-15.

Bult, M., & Burns, T. W. (2019). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 28(6), 663-679.

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1-12.

Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical Positivism (pp. 60-81). Free Press. (Original work published 1932).

Carroll, N. (1999). Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.

Chandrasekhar, S. (1987). Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science. University of Chicago Press.

Chisholm, R. M. (1989). Theory of Knowledge (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Code, L. (1987). Epistemic Responsibility. University Press of New England.

Danaher, J. (2021). Axiological Futurism: The Systematic Study of the Future of Values. Futures, 132, 102788.

Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer.

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Duhem, P. (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (P. P. Wiener, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1906).

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.

Evans, S. W., & Selgelid, M. J. (2015). Biosecurity and open-source biology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(4), 1029-1051.

Findlay, J. N. (1970). Axiological Ethics. Macmillan.

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.

Frondizi, R. (1971). What is Value? An Introduction to Axiology (2nd ed.). Open Court.

Galison, P., & Hevly, B. (Eds.). (1992). Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford University Press.

Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford University Press.

Habermas, J. (2015). Knowledge and Human Interests (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Polity Press. (Original work published 1968).

Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2009). Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases (4th ed.). Wadsworth.

Hartmann, N. (1926). Ethik. Walter de Gruyter.

Herkert, J. R. (2000). Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303-313.

Herzog, L. M., Norheim, O. F., Emanuel, E. J., & McCoy, M. S. (2021). Covax must go beyond proportional allocation of covid vaccines to ensure fair and equitable access. BMJ, 372, m4853.

Jamieson, D. (1996). Ethics and intentional climate change. Climatic Change, 33(3), 323-336.

Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage Publications.

Jonas, H. (1984). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (H. Jonas & D. Herr, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1979).

Khodjamkulov, U. N. (2024). The role of the axiological approach in the development of education in modern pedagogy. Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research, 2(12), 278-282.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (pp. 320-339). University of Chicago Press.

Lacey, H. (1999). Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. Routledge.

Lacey, H. (2016). Science, values and objectivity from the perspective of a value-free ideal. In K. C. Elliott & D. Steel (Eds.), Current Controversies in Values and Science (pp. 42-58). Routledge.

Lander, E. S., et al. (2019). Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing. Nature, 567(7747), 165-168.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.

Longino, H. E. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press.

Lowe, E. J. (2002). A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

McAllister, J. W. (1996). Beauty and Revolution in Science. Cornell University Press.

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.

O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.

Oreskes, N. (2019). Why Trust Science? Princeton University Press.

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.

Perry, R. B. (1926). General Theory of Value. Longmans, Green.

Quine, W. V. O. (1948). On what there is. The Review of Metaphysics, 2(5), 21-38.

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20-43.

Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2015). The Elements of Moral Philosophy (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and Prediction. University of Chicago Press.

Rescher, N. (1969). Introduction to Value Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Resnik, D. B. (2020). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Routledge.

Scheler, M. (1973). Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values (M. S. Frings & R. L. Funk, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1913-1916)

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.

Scruton, R. (2009). Beauty. Oxford University Press.

Selgelid, M. J. (2016). Gain-of-function research: Ethical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(4), 923-964.

Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53-74.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO.

Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Clarendon Press.

Von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation. Springer.

Wilczek, F. (2015). A Beautiful Question: Finding Nature's Deep Design. Penguin Press.