The Role of General Courts (District Courts) in Resolving Business Disputes in Indonesia

Daniel Simalango; Debora Debora

doi:10.55927/fjas.v4i5.116

Authors

Daniel Simalango Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Debora Debora Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v4i5.116

Keywords:

Business Disputes, District Courts, Dispute Resolution, Litigation, Business Law

Abstract

This study examines the role and procedure of resolving business disputes through District Courts in Indonesia. As a sector that supports the country's economy, business disputes in Indonesia often occur even though there is a contract that regulates the relationship between the relevant parties. The District Court as a law enforcement agency has the authority to resolve business disputes, although there are restrictions if the dispute resolution has been agreed upon through non-litigation channels such as arbitration. This study uses a normative legal research method, by analyzing applicable legal regulations, and conducting a case study at the Tarutung District Court, North Sumatra. Although the District Court plays an important role in the resolution of business disputes, there is no specific procedure for business disputes compared to other civil disputes in the litigation pathway.

References

Amrian, Nurnaningsih. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan,” n.d., 16–83.

Benuf, Kornelius, Siti Mahmudah, and Ery Agus Priyono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Konsumen Financial Technology Di Indonesia.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160.

Dewi Trisna, Putu Eka. “Karakteristik Khusus Pengadilan Niaga Dalam Mengadili Perkara Kepailitan.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati 5, no. 1 (2023): 322.

Idayanti, Soesi. Hukum Bisnis: Hukum Bisnis. Vol. 3, 2020.

Khairinal. “Pengantar Bisnis Dari Barter Ke Bisnis Online,” 2017.

Kholid, Muhamad. “Kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri Dan Lembaga Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis.” ’Adliya 9, no. 1 (2015): 167–84.

Nurlani, Meirina. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 3, no. 1 (2022): 27. https://doi.org/10.32502/khdk.v3i1.4519.

Putri, Sherly Ayuna, Ema Rahmawati, and Nun Harrieti. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Pasar Modal Pada Pengadilan Negeri.” Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 151–65.

Rosidi, Ahmad, M Zainuddin, and Ismi Arifiana. “Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research).” Journal Law and Government 2, no. 1 (2024): 46–58.

Luh Putu Suciati, Bambang Juanda, Akhmad Fauzi, and Ernan Rustiadi. “Peran Kelembagaan Perdesaan Untuk Keberlanjutan Penerapan SRI Di Kabupaten Karawang.” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia 14, no. 2 (2014): 109–27. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v14i2.01.

Sunarto, Kamanto. Pengantar Sosiologi. Jakarta, Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Indonesia, 2004.

Tinjauan, A, Pustaka Mengenai, Pengertian Peradilan, and Dan Administrasi Peradilan. “Court Di Indonesia, Serta Sistem Beracara Secara E-Court,” n.d., 24–104.